All Issue

2016 Vol.49, Issue 5 Preview Page
Weighting assessment on evaluation indicators of dam rehabilitation using the AHP analysis

AHP분석을 통한 댐 재개발 평가항목 중요도 평가

Ji-Hyeok Choia
,
Jong-Suk Kimb
,
Ji-Hye Kwonc
,
Young-Il Moonab*
최 지혁a
,
김 종석b
,
권 지혜c
,
문 영일ab*
aDept. of Civil Engineering, The University of Seoul
bUrban Flood Research Institute, The University of Seoul
cInfrastructure Safety Research Institute, KISTEC
a서울시립대학교 토목공학과
b서울시립대학교 도시홍수연구소
c한국시설안전공단 시설안전연구소
*교신저자. *Corresponding Author. 
31 May 2016. pp. 381-389
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

In this study, we developed evaluation indicators of dam rehabilitation considering climate change in order to prepare for safety of aging dam facilities in accordance with changes in rainfall intensity. The validity and appropriateness of each indicator, and the evaluation criteria were selected for quantitative indicators for each detail through domestic and international case studies, literature review, and expert advice. The survey was carried out to estimate the importance of each indicator for dam rehabilitation. The subjective assessment of the respondents was rearranged using pairwise comparison from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The reliability of the survey results was evaluated through consistent verification. In addition, a comparative assessment was carried out which evaluated the reliability importance estimation result to refine the criteria to distinguish rating scales between expert and non-expert groups on dam-related fields.

Keywords
Dam Rehabilitation Evaluation
Climate Change
AHP
Consistency analysis

본 연구에서는 기후변화로 인한 강우강도의 변화와 댐 시설물의 노후화에 따른 댐 안전성의 문제를 대비하기 위하여 댐 재개발 평가항목을 개발하였으며, 국내외 사례 및 문헌조사, 그리고 전문가 자문을 통해 각 평가항목에 대한 타당성 및 적합성 검토를 실시하고, 각 세부지표에 대한 정량적 평가기준을 선정하였다. 댐 재개발에 대한 항목별 중요도 산정을 위하여 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 평가항목간의 쌍대비교를 통해 응답자의 주관적 평가결과를 재정리하고 일관성 검증을 통하여 조사결과에 대한 신뢰성을 평가하였다. 또한, 댐 관련 분야에 대한 전문가와 비전문가 그룹을 구분하기 위한 기준과 평가척도를 세분화하여 응답결과의 신뢰도와 평가항목의 중요도 산정결과에 대한 비교평가를 수행하였다.

키워드
댐 재개발 평가
기후변화
AHP
신뢰도 분석
References
1
Association of State Dam Safety Officials (ASDSO) (2009). The Cost of Rehabilitating Our Nation`s Dams.
2
Cheng-Tan Tung, Henry Chao, Peterson Julian (2012). “Group Geometric Consistency Index of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).” African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 6, No. 26, pp. 7659-7668.
3
Choi, B.G. (2007). “Application of water resources through dam rehabilitation.” Journal of Water Resources Association, Vol. 40, No 5. pp. 88-95.
4
Cho, K.T. (2002). “Aggregation of Multiple Evaluator’s Weights in Applying the AHP to Evaluate Technology Alternatives.” Korean Management Science Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 139-154.
5
Facility Management System (FMS) (2015). http://www.fms.or.kr
6
International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD) (2015) http://www.iclod-cigb.org/home.asp
7
Jung, Y., Choi, M.H. (2012). “Survey-Based Approach for Hydrological Vulnerability Indicators Due to Climate Change: Case Study of Small-scale Rivers.” Journal of the American Water Resource Association. Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 256-265.
8
Jung, Y., Kim, D.E., Choi, M.H., Kim, S.D., Park, M.J. (2014). “Vulnerability Resilience in the Major Watersheds of the Korean Peninsula.” Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 857-868.
9
Jung, Y.L., Nam, H.H. (2014). “A Development of the Post-evaluation Index about Maintenance of Remains by using Delphi and AHP Method.” Journal of Architectural History, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 19-33.
10
Kang, H.Y., Lee, S.H., Kim, J.S., Moon, Y.I. (2015). “Characterizing Changes of Hydrologic Variability at Multi-purpose Dams in Korea” Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 123-130.
11
Kim, H.D., Kim, S.J., Kim, P.S. (2011). “Development of the Priority Decision System for Redevelopment of Agricultural Reservoir.” Journal of the Korean society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 45-52.
12
Korea National Committee on Large Dams (KNCOLD) (2015) http://www.kncold.or.kr
13
Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation (KISTEC) (2011). Specific Guide for In-depth Inspection on Dams.
14
Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation (KISTEC) (2015). `14~`15 In-depth Insepction Report.
15
Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) (2011). Projection Report of Climate change over Korean Peninsula.
16
Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC) (2007). Priority Decision for Redevelopment of Agricultural Reservoir.
17
K-water (2006). Development of Policies and Investment Ranking in Water Resources Projects(In case of Dam Project).
18
Lee, C.C., Jang, S.H., Lee, C.H. (2008). “A Study on the Effective Operation System for Water Supply of Andong Dam Considering the Flow of Nak-dong River.” Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 129-136.
19
Lee, J.J., Park, J.S., Rhee, K.H. (2014). “Development and Application of Hydrological Safety Evaluation Guidelines for Agricultural Reservoir with AHP.” Journal of Wetlands Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 235-243.
20
Meng Yang, Xin Qian, Yuchao Zhang, Jinbao Sheng, Dengle Shen, Yi Ge. (2011). “Spatial Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Flood Risks in Aging-Dam Management in China: A Framework and Case Study.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 1368-1387.
21
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT) (2007). Decision Making Model for Most Preferable Alternative in Flood Control Projects.
22
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) (2003), Report of river project assessment in Japan.
23
Ministry of Science and Technology (MST) (2004). Technology for Sustainable Dam Development.
24
Public Infrastructure Engineering Vulnerability Committee (PIEVC) (2012). Climate change and Infrastructure Vulnerability Assessment.
25
Saaty, T.L. (1987). “Rank Generation, Preservation, and Reversal in the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Decision Science, Vol. 18, pp. 157-177.
26
Seo, J.P., Lee, C.W., Woo, C.S., Lee, H.H. (2014). “Development of Indicators for Dredging Evaluation and Form on Erosion Control Dam Using the Delphi Technique and AHP Analysis.” Journal of Korean Environmental Restoration Technology, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 1-15.
27
Shim, S.B. (2014). “National policy recommendations of aging dam rehabilitation, Water Policy Vision.” Korean Water Resources Association, pp. 2-15.
28
Song, K.W., Lee, Y. (2013). “Re-Scaling for Improving the Consistency of the AHP Method.” Social Science Research Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 271-288.
29
Song, S.H., Gwon, S.H., Park, J.B., Hong, S.K. (2009). “Application of the Delphi Technique in Modifying AHP Method.” Korean Management Science Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 53-64.
30
Srdjevic, Z., Blagojevic, B., Srdjevic, B. (2011). “AHP Based Group Decision Making in Ranking Loan Applicants for Purchasing Irrigation Equipment: A Case Study.” Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 531-543
31
Yang, M., Quan, X., Zhang, Y., Sheng, J., Shen, D., Ge, Y. (2011). “Spatial multicriteria decision analysis of flood risks in aging-dam management in China: a framework and case study.” International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 1368-1387.
32
Yi, C.S., Lee, S.C., Kim H.S., Shim M.P. (2005). “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Flood Control Project 1. A Comparative Analysis of AHP and MAUT.” Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 337-346.
Information
  • Publisher :KOREA WATER RESOURECES ASSOCIATION
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국수자원학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국수자원학회 논문집
  • Volume : 49
  • No :5
  • Pages :381-389
  • Received Date : 2016-02-05
  • Revised Date : 2016-03-05
  • Accepted Date : 2016-03-11
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.5.381
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korea Water Resources Association Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
Online Submission
Archives
  • scopus
  • KCI-수자원
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close