All Issue

2018 Vol.51, Issue 11S Preview Page

Research Article

Quantitative uncertainty analysis for the climate change impact assessment using the uncertainty delta method

기후변화 영향평가에서의 Uncertainty Delta Method를 활용한 정량적 불확실성 분석

Jae-Kyoung Leea*
이 재경a*
aInnovation Center for Engineering Education, Daejin University
a대진대학교 공학교육혁신센터
* Corresponding Author
30 November 2018. pp. 1079-1089
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

The majority of existing studies for quantifying uncertainties in climate change impact assessments suggest only the uncertainties of each stage, and not the total uncertainty and its propagation in the whole procedure. Therefore, this study has proposed a new method, the Uncertainty Delta Method (UDM), which can quantify uncertainties using the variances of projections (as the UDM is derived from the first-order Taylor series expansion), to allow for a comprehensive quantification of uncertainty at each stage and also to provide the levels of uncertainty propagation, as follows: total uncertainty, the level of uncertainty increase at each stage, and the percentage of uncertainty at each stage. For quantifying uncertainties at each stage as well as the total uncertainty, all the stages - two emission scenarios (ES), three Global Climate Models (GCMs), two downscaling techniques, and two hydrological models - of the climate change assessment for water resources are conducted. The total uncertainty took 5.45, and the ESs had the largest uncertainty (4.45). Additionally, uncertainties are propagated stage by stage because of their gradual increase: 5.45 in total uncertainty consisted of 4.45 in emission scenarios, 0.45 in climate models, 0.27 in downscaling techniques, and 0.28 in hydrological models. These results indicate the projection of future water resources can be very different depending on which emission scenarios are selected. Moreover, using Fractional Uncertainty Method (FUM) by Hawkins and Sutton (2009), the major uncertainty contributor (emission scenario: FUM uncertainty 0.52) matched with the results of UDM. Therefore, the UDM proposed by this study can support comprehension and appropriate analysis of the uncertainty surrounding the climate change impact assessment, and make possible a better understanding of the water resources projection for future climate change.

Keywords
Uncertainty quantification
Uncertainty propagation
Climate change
Uncertainty delta method
Total uncertainty

기존 기후변화 영향평가에서 발생하는 불확실성에 대한 연구들은 전체과정에서 총 불확실성과 그 전파에 대한 것보다 각 단계별 불확실성에 초점을 맞추어 연구가 진행되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 first-order Taylor series expansion에 기반하여 전망의 분산을 이용하는 Uncertainty Delta Method (UDM)를 제안하였으며, 이 방법은 각 단계별 불확실성 정량화와 증감정도, 단계별 불확실성 비율, 총 불확실성의 전파 과정 제시가 가능하다. 본 연구에서는 기후변화 영향평가 과정의 단계별 불확실성 정량화와 전파과정 분석을 위해 미래 2030년부터 2059년까지를 대상으로 2개 배출 시나리오, 3개 GCM, 2개 상세화기법, 2개 수문모형을 사용하였다. 결과를 분석하면, UDM을 이용한 총 불확실성은 5.45(배출시나리오: 4.45, 상세화기법: 0.45, 상세화기법: 0.27, 수문모형: 0.28)이며, 배출 시나리오의 불확실성(4.45)이 가장 크게 나타났다. 불확실성은 각 단계를 거칠수록 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 어떠한 배출시나리오를 선정하느냐에 따라 미래 수자원전망이 매우 달라질 수 있음을 의미한다. 다음으로 Hawkins and Sutton (2009)가 제안한 Fractional Uncertainty Method (FUM)을 이용한 기후변화 영향평가 불확실성 분석에서 가장 불확실성이 큰 요인은 배출 시나리오(FUM 불확실성: 0.52)이며, 이 결과는 UDM 결과와 동일하게 나타났다. 따라서 이 연구에서 제안한 UDM은 기후변화 영향평가에서의 불확실성 이해와 적합한 분석 및 미래 기후변화 대비 보다 나은 수자원 전망이 가능하도록 기여할 것으로 판단된다.

키워드
불확실성 정량화
불확실성 전파
기후변화
Uncertainty Delta Method
총 불확실성
References
1
Bae, D.-H., Jung, I., Lee, B. J., and Lee, M. H. (2011). "Future Korean water resources projection considering uncertainty of GCMs and hydrological model." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 44, pp. 389-406.
10.3741/JKWRA.2011.44.5.389
2
Bae, D.-H., Jung, I., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2011). "Hydrologic uncertainties in climate change from IPCC AR4 GCM simulations of the Chungju basin." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 401, No. 1-2, pp. 90-105.
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.012
3
Beven, K. J., and Freer, J. (2001) "Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 249, pp. 11-29.
10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8
4
Chen, J., Brissette, F., Poulin, A., and Leconte, R. (2011). "Overall uncertainty study of the hydrological impacts of climate change for a Canadian watershed." Water Resources Research, Vol. 47, W12509.
10.1029/2011WR010602
5
Gay, C., and Estrada, F. (2010). "Objective probabilities about future climate are a matter of opinion." Climatic Change, Vol. 99, pp. 27-46.
10.1007/s10584-009-9681-4
6
Ghosh, S., and Mujumdar, P. P. (2007). "Nonparametric methods for modelling GCM and scenario uncertainty in drought assessment." Water Resources Research, Vol. 43, W07405, doi:10.1029/ 2006WR005351.
7
Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R. (2009). "The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions." Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, Vol. 90, pp. 1095-1107, doi:10.1157/2009BAMS26071.1.
8
Henderson-Sellers, A. (1993). "An antipodean climate of uncertainty." Climatic Change, Vol. 25, pp. 203-224.
10.1007/BF01098373
9
Hwang, J. S., Jeong, D. I., Lee, J.-K., and Kim, Y.-O. (2007). "Application of monthly water balance models for the climate change impact assessment." Journal of Korean Water Resources, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 147-158.
10
IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptations, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change.
11
Jones, R. N. (2000). "Managing uncertainty in climate change projections–Issues for impact assessment: An editorial comment." Climatic Change, Vol. 45, pp. 403-419.
10.1023/A:1005551626280
12
Jung, I., Bae, D.-H., and Lee, B. J. (2013). "Possible change in Korean streamflow seasonality based on multi-model climate projections." Hydrological Processes, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 1033-1045.
10.1002/hyp.9215
13
Katz, R. W. (2001). Techniques for estimating uncertainty in climate change scenarios and impact studies, Environmental and Societal Impacts Group Report, National Centers for Atmospheric Research.
14
Kay, A. L., Davies, H. N., Bell, V. A., and Jones, R. G. (2009). "Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England." Climatic Change, Vol. 92, pp. 41-63.
10.1007/s10584-008-9471-4
15
Kim, B. S., Kim, S. J., Kim, H. S., and Jun, H. D. (2010). "An impact assessment of climate and landuse change on water resources in the Han River." Journal of Korean Water Resources, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 309-323.
16
Kim, S. J., Kim, Y. S., and Kim, H. S. (2014). "Drought and flood risk assessment considering climate change in Chungju Dam." Water for future, Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 296, pp. 8-17.
17
Lawrence, J., Reisinger, A., Mullan, B., and Jackson, B. (2013). "Exploring climate change uncertainties to support adaptive management of changing flood-risk." Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 33, pp. 133-142.
10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.008
18
Lee, J.-K., Kim, Y.-O., and Kim, Y. (2017). "A new uncertainty analysis in the climate change impact assessment." International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 37, pp. 3837-3846.
10.1002/joc.4957
19
Lee, M.-H., So, J.-M., and Bae, D.-H. (2016). "Development of climate change uncertainty assessment method for projecting the water resources." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 49, No. 8, pp. 657-671.
10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.8.657
20
Maurer, E. P. (2007). "Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California, under two emission scenarios." Climatic Change, Vol. 82, pp. 309-325.
10.1007/s10584-006-9180-9
21
Minh, T. V., Thannob, A., Siriporn, S., Srivatsan, V. R., and Shie-Yui, L. (2016). "Statistical downscaling rainfall using artificial neural network: significantly wetter Bangkok?" Theoretical and Applied Climatology, Vol. 126, pp. 453-467.
10.1007/s00704-015-1580-1
22
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Barnett, D. N., Jones, G. S., Webb, M. J., Collins, M., and Stainforth, D. A. (2004). "Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations." Nature, Vol. 430, pp. 768-772.
10.1038/nature0277115306806
23
Najafi, M. R., Moradkhani, H., and Jung, I. (2011). "Assessing the uncertainties of hydrologic model selection in climate change impact studies." Hydrological Processes, Vol. 25(18), pp. 2814-2826.
10.1002/hyp.8043
24
Ojha, C. S. P., Goyal, M. K., and Adeloye, A. J. (2010). "Downscaling of precipitation for lake catchment using linear multiple regression and neural network." The Open Hydrology Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 122-136.
10.2174/1874378101004010122
25
Poulin, A., Brissette, F., Leconte, R., Arsenault, R., and Malo, J.-S. (2011). "Uncertainty of hydrological modeling in climate change impact studies in a Canadian, snow-dominanted river basin." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 409, pp. 626-636.
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.057
26
Prudhomme, C., and Davies, H. (2009). "Assessing uncertainties in climate change impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 2: future climate." Climatic Change, Vol. 93, pp. 197-222.
10.1007/s10584-008-9461-6
27
Rim, C.-S., and Kim, S.-Y. (2014). "Climate aridity/humidity characteristics in Seoul according to changes in temperature and precipitation based on RCP 4.5 and 8.5." Journal of Water Resources Association, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 421-434.
10.3741/JKWRA.2014.47.5.421
28
Schneider, S. H. (1983). "CO2, climate change society: A brief overview." In: Social Science Research and Climate Change: Interdisciplinary Appraisal. [Chen, R. S., E. Boulding, and S. H. Schneider (eds)]. D. Reidel, Boston, MA, UAS, pp. 9-15.
29
Stainforth, D. A., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Collins, M., Faull, N., Frame, D. J., Kettleborough, J. A., Knight, S., Martin, A., Murthp, J. M., Piani, C., Sexton, D., Smith, L. A., Spicer, R. A., Thorpe, A. J., and Allen M. R. (2005). "Uncertainty in predictions of climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases." Nature, Vol. 433, pp. 403-406.
10.1038/nature0330115674288
30
Tebaldi, C., Smith, R. L., Nychka, D., and Mearns, L. O. (2005). "Quantifying uncertainty in projection of regional climate change: A Bayesian approach to the analysis of multimodel ensembles." Journal of Climate, Vol. 18, pp. 1524-1540.
10.1175/JCLI3363.1
31
Wilby, R. L., and Harris, I. (2006). "A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, U.K." Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, W02419.
10.1029/2005WR004065
32
Yu, P. S., Yang, T. C., and Chen, S. J. (2001). "Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall-streamflow model." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 244, pp. 43-59.
10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00328-6
33
Zhang, H., Huang, G. H., Wang, D., and Zhang, X. (2011). "Uncertainty assessment of climate change impacts in the hydrology of small prairie wetlands." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 396, pp. 94-103.
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.037
34
Zhang, X., Xu, Y.-P., and Fu, G. (2014). "Uncertainties in SWAT extreme flow simulation under climate change." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 515, pp. 205-222.
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.064
Information
  • Publisher :KOREA WATER RESOURECES ASSOCIATION
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국수자원학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국수자원학회 논문집
  • Volume : 51
  • No :11
  • Pages :1079-1089
  • Received Date : 2018-07-25
  • Revised Date : 2018-10-19; 2018-10-31
  • Accepted Date : 2018-10-31
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2018.51.S-1.1079
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korea Water Resources Association Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
Online Submission
Archives
  • scopus
  • KCI-수자원
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close