All Issue

2018 Vol.51, Issue 6
Analysis of peak drought severity time and period using meteorological and hydrological drought indices

기상학적 가뭄지수와 수문학적 가뭄지수를 이용한 첨두가뭄심도 발생시점 및 가뭄기간 분석

Soo Hyun Kima
,
Eun-Sung Chunga
,
Changsam Jeonga*
김 수현a
,
정 은성a
,
정 창삼a*
aDepartment of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology Paper
a서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과
*교신저자. *Corresponding Author. 
30 June 2018. pp. 471-479
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

This study analyzed the peak time of drought severity and drought period using meteorological and hydrological drought indices. Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) using rainfall data was used for meteorological drought and Streamflow Drought Index (SDI) and Standardized Streamflow Index (SSI) using streamflow data were used for the hydrological drought. This study was applied to the Cheongmicheon watershed which is a mixture area for rural and urban regions. The rainfall data period used in this study is 32.5 years (January of 1985~June of 2017) and the corresponding streamflow was simulated using SWAT. After the drought indices were calculated using the collected data, the characteristics of drought were analyzed by time series distribution of the calculated drought indices. Based on the results of the this study, it can be seen that hydrological drought occurs after meteorological drought. The difference between SDI and SPI peak occurrence time, difference in drought start date and average drought duration is greater than SSI and SPI. In general, SSI shows more severe than SDI. Therefore, various drought indices should be used at the identification of drought characteristics.

Keywords
Peak drought severity time
Meteorological drought index
Hydrological drought index
SWAT

본 연구는 기상학적 및 수문학적 가뭄지수를 이용하여 가뭄사상의 첨두 심도 발생시점과 가뭄발생 기간에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 연구를 수행하 기 위해 사용한 가뭄지수로 기상학적 가뭄지수는 표준강수지수(Standardized Precipitation Index, SPI)를 사용하였으며, 수문학적 가뭄지수로 는 하천가뭄지수(Streamflow Drought Index, SDI)와 표준하천유량지수(Standardized Streamflow Index, SSI)를 이용하였다. 연구 대상지역 은 농촌과 도시가 공존하는 청미천 유역을 선택하였으며, 평가기간은 1985년 1월부터 2017년 6월까지 32.5년을 평가하였다 하천유량은 SWAT 모형을 이용하여 산정하였다. 수집한 데이터를 이용하여 가뭄지수를 산정한 후에 시계열을 토대로 가뭄의 특성을 분석하였다. 그 결과 수문학적 가 뭄은 기상학적 가뭄이 발생한 후에 발생하는 것을 확인할 수 있다. SDI가 SSI보다 SPI와의 첨두 발생시점, 가뭄 시작일의 차이와 평균 가뭄기간이 더 크게 나지만, 가뭄지수의 심도를 비교해보면 일반적으로 SSI가 SDI 보다 심각한 심도를 나타내고 있다. 그러므로 가뭄의 특성을 확인하기 위해 서는 기상학적, 수문학적 가뭄지수 등 다양한 가뭄지수를 검토해야 한다.

키워드
첨두가뭄심도시점
기상학적 가뭄지수
수문학적 가뭄지수
SWAT
References
1
Beven, K. (1989). “Changing ideas in hydrology - the case of physically-based models.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 105, No. 1-2, pp. 157-172.
2
Beven, K. (2002). “Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system.” Hydrological Processes, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 189-206.
3
Blenkinsop, S., and Fowler, H. J. (2007). “Changes in drought frequency, severity and duration for the Britich lsles projected by the PRUDENCE regional climate models.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 342, No. 1-2, pp. 50-71.
4
Correia, F. N., Santos, M. A., and Rodrigues, R. P. (1991). “Reliability in regional drought studies.” Water Resources Engineering Risk Assessment, pp. 43-62.
5
Dagon, S., Berktay, A., and Singh, V. P. (2012) “Comparison of multi-monthly rainfall-based drought severity indices, with application to semi-arid Konya closed basin, Turkey.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 470-471, pp. 255-268.
6
Du Pisani, C. G., Fouché, H. J., and Venter, J. C. (1998). “Assessing rangeland drought in South Africa.” Agricultural Systems, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 367-380.
7
Edossa, D. S., Babel, M. S., and Gupta, A. D. (2010). “Drought analysis in the Awash river basin, Ethiopia.” Water Resources Management, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 1441-1460.
8
Heim, R. R. (2002). “A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States.” Bulletin of the American Meteoro-logical Society, Vol. 83, No. 8, pp. 1149-1165.
9
Jain, V. K., Pandey, R. P., Jain, M. K., and Byun, H. I. (2015). “Comparison of drought indices for appraisal of drought characteristics in the Ken river basin.” Weather and Climate Extremes, Vol. 8, pp. 1-11.
10
Keyantash, J., and Dracup, J. (2002). “The quantification of drought: An evaluation of drought indices.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 83, No. 8, pp. 1167-1180.
11
Kim, S. H., and Chung, E. S. (2017). “Peak drought index analysis of Cheongmicheon watershed using meterological and hydro-logical drought index.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 65-73.
12
Lee, B. R., Sung, J. H., and Chung, E. S. (2015). “Comparison of meteorological drought and hydrological drought index.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 69-78.
13
McKee, T. B., Doeskin, N. J., and Kleist, J. (1993). “Drought moni-toring with multiple time scales.” Proceedings 9th Conference on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society, pp. 233-236.
14
Nalbantis, I. (2008). “Evaluation of a hydrological drought index.” European Water, Vol. 23, No. 24, pp. 67-77.
15
Nalbantis, I., and Tsakiris, G. (2009). “Assessment of hydrological drought revisited.” Water Resources Management, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 881-897.
16
Shiau, J.T., and Modarres, R. (2009). “Copula-based drought severity-duration-frequency analysis in Iran.” Meteorological Application, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 481-489.
17
Spinoni, J., Naumann, G., Carrao, H., Barbosa, P., and Vogt, J. (2014). “World drought frequency, duration and severity for 1951-2010.” International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 2792-2804.
18
Sung, J., and Chung, E. S. (2014). “Development of stream drought severity-duration-frequency curves using the threshold level method.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 18, pp. 3341-3351.
19
Tate, E. L., and Gustard, A. (2000). “Drought definition: A hydrological perspective.” Drought and Drought Mitigation in Europe, Vol. 14, pp.23-48.
20
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Begueria, S., and Lopez-Moreno, J. I. (2010). “A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index.” Journal of Climate, Vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 1696-1718.
21
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., López-Moreno, J. I., Beguería, S., Lorenzo- Lacruz, J., Azorin-Molina, C., and Morán-Tejeda, E. (2011). “Accurate computation of a streamflow drought index.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 318-332.
22
Wilhite, D. A., and Glantz, M. H. (1985). “Understanding: the drought phenomenon: The role of definitions.” Water International, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 111-120.
23
Won, K. J., and Chung, E. S. (2016). “Drought analysis of Cheongmi-cheon watershed using meteorological, agricultural, and hydro-logical drought indices.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 509-518.
24
Won, K. J., Chung, E. S., Lee, B. R., and Sung, J. H. (2016). “Characteristics of the Han river basin drought using SPEI and RDI.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 187-196.
25
Won, K. J., Sung, J. H., and Chung, E. S. (2015). “Parametric assessment of water use vulnerability of South Korea using SWAT model and TOPSIS.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 657-657.
26
Yeh, C.-F., Wang, J., Yeh, H.-F., and Lee, C.-H. (2015) “SDI and Markov chains for regional drought characteristics.” Sustain-ability, Vol. 7, No. 8, pp. 10789-10808.
27
Zhao, L., Lyn, A., Wu, J., Hayes, M., Zhenghong, T., and He, B. (2014). “The impact of meteorological drought on streamflow drought in the Jinghe river basin of China.” Chinese Geo-graphical Science, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 694-705.
Information
  • Publisher :KOREA WATER RESOURECES ASSOCIATION
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국수자원학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국수자원학회 논문집
  • Volume : 51
  • No :6
  • Pages :471-479
  • Received Date : 2017-12-27
  • Revised Date : 2018-02-06
  • Accepted Date : 2018-02-28
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2018.51.6.471
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korea Water Resources Association Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
Online Submission
Archives
  • scopus
  • KCI-수자원
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close