All Issue

2021 Vol.54, Issue 9 Preview Page

Research Article

Evaluation of InVEST habitat quality model using aquatic ecosystem health data

수생태계 건강성 자료를 이용한 InVEST habitat quality 모델 적용성 평가

Jiwan Leea
,
Soyoung Woob*
,
Yongwon Kimc
,
Jongyoon Parkd
,
Seongjoon Kime
이 지완a
,
우 소영b*
,
김 용원c
,
박 종윤d
,
김 성준e
aResearch Professor, Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
bPh.D. Candidate, Department of Civil, Environmental and Plant Engineering, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
cIntegrated Ph.D. Student, Department of Civil, Environmental and Plant Engineering, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
dSenior Research Fellow. Environmental Assessment Group, Korea Environment Institute, Bldg. B, Sejong, Korea
eProfessor, Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
a건국대학교 공과대학 사회환경공학부 학술연구교수
b건국대학교 일반대학원 사회환경플랜트공학과 박사수료
c건국대학교 일반대학원 사회환경플랜트공학과 박사과정
d한국환경·정책평가연구원 환경평가본부 연구위원
e건국대학교 공과대학 사회환경공학부 교수
*Corresponding Author
30 September 2021. pp. 657-666
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Ecosystem biodiversity is rapidly being lost due to changes in habitat, fragmentation of habitat, climate change, and land use changes by human activities. Recently, attempts have been made to approach the watershed management level to secure the health of the watershed, but studies on how to approach biodiversity and habitat management are still in lack. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the habitat quality of Geum river basin using Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) habitat quality model. The results of habitat quality was verified to eco-natural map and ecological watershed health evaluation results. The habitat quality of watershed was evaluated from 0 to 0.86 and the results showed that habitat quality was higher in upstream than downstream. Compared the habitat quality value in each eco-natural grade, the average habitat quality of 1st, 2nd and 3rd grades were 0.80, 0.76 and 0.71 respectively. The results of the correlation analysis with ecological watershed health data, the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.58, and the person coefficient was 0.76. The results of this study may be used as foundation data to support habitat protection and implementation of long-term biodiversity-related policies.

Keywords
Habitat quality
InVEST
Biodiversity
Eco-natural map
Aquatic ecosystem

인간활동으로 인해 서식처의 변화, 서식처의 파편화를 비롯하여 기후변화, 토지이용의 변화 등으로 생태계 생물 다양성은 빠르게 손실되고있는 상황이다. 최근 들어 유역의 건전성을 확보하기 위해 유역관리 차원에서 접근하려는 시도가 시작되었으나 어떠한 수단을 통해 생물다양성과 서식처 관리에 대하여 접근할 수 있는지에 대한 연구는 아직 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구의 목적은 금강유역을 대상으로 Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) habitat quality model을 이용하여 유역의 서식처 질을 평가하는 것이다. 서식처 평가결과는 생태·자연도 및 수생태 건전성 평가결과와의 비교분석을 통해 검증되었다. 금강유역의 서식처 질은 0.0 ~ 0.86으로 분석되었으며, 유역의 하류보다 상류에서 서식처 질이 더 높은 것으로 나타났다. 생태·자연도 등급별 평균 서식처 질을 비교한 결과 1등급, 2등급, 3등급에서 각각 0.80, 0.76, 0.71이었다. 수생태 건전성 결과와의 상관성 분석결과 R2은 0.58, Pearson 상관계수는 0.76 였다. 본 연구의 결과는 향후 서식처 보호의 강화와 장기적인 생물 다양성 관련 정책의 실행을 지원하는 기초자료로 활용될 수 있다.

키워드
서식처 질
InVEST
생물다양성
생태·자연도
수생태계
References
1
Ahn, S.R., and Kim, S.J. (2017). "Assessment of integrated watershed health based on the natural environment, hydrology, water quality, and aquatic ecology." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 5583-5602. 10.5194/hess-21-5583-2017
2
Balvanera, P., Siddique, I., Dee, L., Paquette, A., Isbell, F., Gonzalez, A., and Griffin, J.N. (2014). "Linking biodiversity and ecosystem services: current uncertainties and the necessary next steps." Bioscience, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 49-57. 10.1093/biosci/bit003
3
Berta Aneseyee, A., Noszczyk, T., Soromessa, T., and Elias, E. (2020). "The InVEST habitat quality model associated with land use/cover changes: A qualitative case study of the winike watershed in the Omo-Gibe Basin, Southwest Ethiopia." Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, No. 7, p. 1103. 10.3390/rs12071103
4
EGIS Korea (2021). South Korea, assessed 3 May 2021, <http://egis.me.go.kr>
5
Fuller, T., Sánchez-Cordero, V., Illoldi-Rangel, P., Linaje, M., and Sarkar, S. (2007). "The cost of postponing biodiversity conservation in Mexico." Biological Conservation, Vol. 134, No. 4, pp. 593-600. 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.028
6
Hassan, R., Scholes, R., Ash, N. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends. Island Press, Washington DC, U.S.
7
Hwang, S.J., Lee, S.W., and Yoo, B. (2014). "Ecological conservation and the restoration of freshwater environments in Korea." Paddy and Water Environment, Vol. 12, pp. 1-5. 10.1007/s10333-014-0457-8
8
Jeon, D.J., Lee, Y.J., and Park, J.Y. (2019). "Analysis system for regional environment status to support environmental assessment: A study on the changes of bio habitat according to the development projects." Korea Environment Institute, pp. 1-51.
9
Kim, J., Seo, C., Kwon, H., Ryu, J., and Kim, M. (2012) "A study on the species distribution modeling using national ecosystem survey data." Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 593-607.
10
Kim, M., Yoon, C.G., Rhee, H.P., Hwang, S.J., and Lee, S.W. (2019). "A study on predicting TDI (Trophic Diatom Index) in tributaries of Han river basin using Correlation-based Feature Selection technique and Random Forest algorithm." Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 432-438.
11
Kim, T., Song, C., Lee, W.K., Kim, M., Lim, C.H., Jeon, S.W., and Kim, J. (2015). "Habitat quality valuation using InVEST model in Jeju island." Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 1-11. 10.13087/kosert.2015.18.5.1
12
Kumar, P. (2012). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations. Routledge, London, UK. 10.4324/9781849775489
13
Lee, H.W., Kim, C.K., Hong, H.J., Roh, Y.H., Kang, S.I., Kim, J.H., Shin, S.C., Lee, S.J., Kim, T.Y., and Fisher, D. (2015). "Development of decision supporting framework to enhance natural capital sustainability: Focusing on ecosystem service analysis." Korea Environment Institute, pp. 3479-3651.
14
Lee, J.W., and Kim, S.J. (2019). "Watershed management sector climate change watershed vulnerability and impact assessment strategy." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 67, No. 8, pp. 16-25.
15
Lee, J.W., Park, J.Y., Jung, C.G., and Kim, S.J. (2019). "Evaluation of land use change impact on hydrology and water quality health in Geum River basin." Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 82-96.
16
Lee, M.H., and Jeon, S.W. (2015). Goal 15- conservation, restoration and sustainable use of land ecosystems, sustainable forest management, prevention of desertification and land destruction, and prevention of biodiversity reduction. Korea International Cooperation Agency, Research Paper, pp. 289-307.
17
Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M.B., and Alkemade, R. (2012). "Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe." Biological Conservation, Vol. 155, pp. 1-12. 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016
18
Ministry of Environment (ME) (2021). South Korea, assessed 31 May 2021, <http://ncsd.go.kr>.
19
Oliver, T.H., Heard, M.S., Isaac, N.J., Roy, D.B., Procter, D., Eigenbrod, F., Freckleton, R., Hector, A., Orme, C.D.L., Petchey, O.L., Proença, V., Raffaelli, D., Suttle, K.B., Mace, G.M., Martín-Lopez, B., Woodcock, B.A., and Bullock, J.M. (2015). "Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions." Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 673-684. 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.00926437633
20
Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Pennington, D., and Johnson, K.A. (2011). "The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: A case study in the state of Minnesota." Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 219-242. 10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0
21
Sallustio, L., De Toni, A., Strollo, A., Di Febbraro, M., Gissi, E., Casella, L., Geneletti, D., Munafo, M., Vizzarri, M., and Marchetti, M. (2017). "Assessing habitat quality in relation to the spatial distribution of protected areas in Italy." Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 201, pp. 129-137. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.03128651222
22
Seo, S.B. (2017). Analysis of habitat quality in the Nam-Han River Upstream Watershed using InVEST model. M.S. dissertation, Ewha Woman University, pp. 39-54.
23
Sharp, R., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Wood, S., Guerry, A., Tallis, H., Ricketts, T. (2016). InVEST+ VERSION+ user's guide, Accessed 3 May 2021, <http://data.naturalcapitalproject.org/nightly-build/invest-users-guide/html/>.
24
Sun, X., Jiang, Z., Liu, F., and Zhang, D. (2019). "Monitoring spatio-temporal dynamics of habitat quality in Nansihu Lake basin, eastern China, from 1980 to 2015." Ecological Indicators, Vol. 102, pp. 716-723. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.041
25
Tallis, H., Ricketts, T., and Guerry, A. (2012). InVEST 2.4. 4 user's guide, Accessed 3 May 2021, <https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/software/invest>.
26
Terrado, M., Sabater, S., Chaplin-Kramer, B., Mandle, L., Ziv, G., and Acuña, V. (2016). "Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning." Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 540, pp. 63-70. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.06425836757
27
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2012). Identifying and protecting healthy watersheds: Concepts, assessments, and management approaches. EPA 841-B-11-002.
28
UK National Ecosystem Assessment (UK NEA) (2011). The UK national ecosystem assessment technical report, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
29
United Nations (UN) (2012). Realizing the future we want for all: Report to the Secretary-General, United Nations, assessed 31 May 2021, <https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/Post_2015_UNTTreport.pdf>.
30
United Nations Convention Combat Desertification (UNCCD) (2017). Global land outlook. Secretariat of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Bonn, Germany.
31
Water Environment Information System (WEIS) (2021). South Korea, assessed 3 May 2021, <http://water.nier.go.kr>.
32
Water Resources Management Information System (WAMIS) (2021). South Korea, assessed 3 May 2021, <http://wamis.go.kr>.
33
Wilcove, D.S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., and Losos, E. (1998). "Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States." BioScience, Vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 607-615. 10.2307/1313420
34
Woo, S.Y., Kim, S.J., Hwang, S.J., and Jung, C.G. (2019). "Assessment of changes on water quality and aquatic ecosystem health in Han River basin by additional dam release of stream maintenance flow." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 52, No. spc2, pp. 777-789.
35
Yi, H. (2020). "Impacts of land change on ecosystem service values and environmental sustainability in North Korea (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) through the 2030s." Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 97-121.
Information
  • Publisher :KOREA WATER RESOURECES ASSOCIATION
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국수자원학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국수자원학회 논문집
  • Volume : 54
  • No :9
  • Pages :657-666
  • Received Date : 2021-06-02
  • Revised Date : 2021-06-22
  • Accepted Date : 2021-06-22
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2021.54.9.657
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korea Water Resources Association Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
Online Submission
Archives
  • scopus
  • KCI-수자원
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close